Coming up to my office this morning, I see a little patch of stickers - maybe five of them - stuck to the wall of the elevator. Fruit stickers - the labels stuck onto apples to help the cashier. Someone has used the time riding up to peel them off fruit and deposit them onto the elevator's paneling.
This, of course, is
bad.
And other things are
bad. Police brutality, ISIS, dementia, greed. But is there any useful or even
meaningful commonality to these things? Aren't they tied together
merely by being susceptible to being labeled
bad?
And if that is all, what good are labels like
bad?
The answer is in the mediation of such words between our thinking and our thoughts. The broad, vague categories like
bad are part of the flex of our thinking life. Like the categories
left and
right, or conjunctions such as
and and
or, they are as indispensable
and provisional as our ability to hold things in our palms for a time.
Are those buildings on my right, and those trees on my left? Certainly. Is it
useful to be able to think them so? Yes. What do those buildings or trees have in common? Only that they
are susceptible to being noted as to my right or left on account of my position. Outside my thinking, there is nothing right or left about those buildings or trees. Does that empty such categories of use? No, they are necessary. They are part of my ability to move myself through thoughts, and move thoughts around.
Broad categories are the hands and feet of thought.
When someone tells you something is
bad, or when you hear yourself think with some such broad category, the question is chiefly: what is being
done with the thought? It is the motion of the doing and not the flexibility of the tool that tells.