Walking up Third Avenue in Midtown to the subway, the sidewalk busy with commuters, the mother and child ahead of me begin to stand out because his pace slows and grows heavy. He may be four years old, and both he and mother are expensively dressed - he has a little corduroy jacket whose cut and fit are as adorable as they are unnecessary on anybody whose size is a moving target. His head is turned towards his mother and his eyes are looking straight up the diagonal line of sight towards her eyes that parallels their linked, taut arms: he pulling toward the curb, she keeping him from stepping into the planters set out at intervals to hold trees.
It is rare to see young children talking to their parents as they walk. The angle is too inconvenient - they keep their silence or stop their progress.
Well, as I say, he is slowing down, and his mother with him. They pivot to a planter and stop. He then fumbles with his pants fly, his mother assists, and he begins to urinate into the planter, piss arcing and steaming into the fall air. Commuters stare-and-pretend-not. He even manages to hoist one leg to the side, knee unfixed, in imitation of a pissing dog, I suppose.
I pass and see no more. But what
have I seen - whose idea was it? Did the boy need to piss
right then and this occurred to the mother? Or did just that occur to the child? Or did he - maybe - simply
want to do what so many urban dogs do, at an early stage of development that permitted the action but preceded the social stigma? Or has he learned the lesson of Manhattan that early - that we are crowded into privacy, that we are looked at as I looked, with curiosity but without connection or risk of shame. Or had the mother learned that sadder lesson, that she and her child, in their whiteness and wealth and cuteness, could get away with what would have disgusted others, invited ugly stares and perhaps a citation, had it been done by a mother and son without those advantages: by a mother and child whose relative characteristics would have led me and others
to feel it was gross rather than
to consider child development, infant fascinations and parenting styles.
I come to my subway stop and descend the escalator to the platform. There is one of the homeless old guys I've seen for years, vaguely familiar to me from my commute. His battered Home Depot shopping cart has been banged down the stairs to the platform again, and I wonder how he does it, its width being greater than the stairs or escalator. But he is in the holiday spirit. Flashing green-corded Christmas lights chase around his cart, twined with garland, the lights' cord disappearing into the cracked boom box he carries with him. I think: he has an inverter in there? Or is there a battery-operated kind? Does he have a soldering iron? A wire-stripper? How many D-cells does he go through?
We each have our range of means: pitifully narrow or revoltingly wide, in virtue or willing to vice, but always surprising and uneven, with juts and islands of capacity half-seen through the fog.